When Once Had Been Offered

The right and left hands unlike those two thieves that were crucified one on each hand looking forward and very much guilty of the body and blood of the Lord. It ends up with us standing before him much as it were there after him. The sheep and the goats I believe he once referred to there in the past of which one had stood on each side. Though the sheep on the right and the goats on the left with the judgment being opened and some sent away into life there eternal though separate quite apart from his Son. When referring to things that were taken, Enoch also makes mention as one of his visions, a seeing otherwise where sight once was there blind. The notion particularly that the Shepherd should have been smitten which meant the sheep had been left to the wolves. Though had it really knowing him there as you do a whomever was true. I found out what those last two were technically speaking, the hands without the docking in Acts of the Lord that Paul has referred to thereof. Speaking strictly it seems of the ship which broke into sections. Which makes the missing pieces there of the puzzle, Acts of the Lord twenty-eight and twenty-nine that much more of a retelling there certainly. That is partly one reason why the piece of land that Annanias and Saphira sold and then brought to the Lord had to be listed in price aside from that for the Lord could not be lied to of course. Also with the people of Ninevah not being able to tell their right hand from their left poses an issue as this you see cause who is going to the tell the Lord that no flesh should survive there like that. Or not that he should have had his virgins there after all. In this is a very real danger of virginity being cast off there loosely. You need dockings attached there to Acts the Lord, not that his Word should have been incomplete in itself, to prevent a repeating of the same storm that drove them there after all. As well as something as in the days of Noah to prevent it from happening again from the start. A Euroclydon I believe it was called. And it really had happened there after all. Job is proving especially helpful there truly with telling which way things should have falled out from the start. Which is strange enough certainly for someone who is in a good bit of reeling. The only reason he is not though is his place under the altar as the text there would show of them that were slain. Thus, his voice there cries out to the Lord for avenge us ourselves of the matter as well as provides a good marker there for what would come along later. With the book of Nathan though testifying that it was so there in Job. And that David through his prayers and his faith has declared himself righteous. What is there to prevent Gods Word from being found into a lie from the start. Though God in his mercy had already provided for that question there after all. Where in the Gospels he had mentioned about as it was in the days of Noah so shall the coming of the Son of Man be. For people were eating and drinking and knew not until the flood had come and swept them all there away. Must there be some accounting there of some wrongs. It is not so much as that as necessity surely having been mentioned by several of the prophets as having gone out before him. Sure the accounting is mentioned in general senses that the ones mentioned here in might not fall or otherwise failed from his Word. When speaking of things that had happened, with permission being granted though in the bay horses that sought to go out before him being mentioned of there by the prophet in Zechariah. That we might not have been without him in the end.